In a certain sense, all men are strangers to one another. Even friends do not really know each other. To know a man, one must know all the influences of heredity and environment, as well as his countless moral choices that have fashioned him into what he is.
Though we do not really know one another, tracing the course of a man’s life sometimes offers rich reward, particularly when we see the great driving forces which have motivated him.
For instance, how greatly your life and mine would be benefited if we could experience the same surge of Christ-life that moved Saul of Tarsus (later called Paul) and plumb even a little the hidden depths of the meaning in his words, “I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus” (Gal. 6:17).
One thing is sure about these words: they were an acknowledgment of Christ’s ownership. Paul belonged to the Lord Jesus — spirit, soul, and body. He was branded for Christ.
When Paul claimed to bear in his body the wounds of the Lord, he was claiming no “stigmata,” as did Saint Francis of Assisi in 1224 A.D. It is not a bodily identification by outward crucifixion. He had been “crucified with Christ” (Gal. 2:20).
Branded by Devotion to a Task
The marks of Paul’s inward crucifixion were plainly evident. First of all, Paul was branded by devotion to a task.
If, as tradition says, Paul was only four feet six inches in height, then he was the greatest dwarf that ever lived. He out-paced, out-prayed, and out-passioned all his contemporaries. On his escutcheon was blazed: “One thing I do.” He was blind to all that other men gloried in.
Pascal was bitterly criticized because apart from the immortal soul of man, he could see no scenery anywhere worth looking at.
By the same token, the Apostle Paul might be castigated for saying not a word about Grecian art or the splendor of the Pantheon. His was a separation to spirituality.
After the Athenian clash on Mars’ Hill, Paul poured contempt on the wisdom of this world, dying daily to the temptation to outwit and out-think the wise. His task was not that of getting over a viewpoint, but of overcoming the legions of hell!
Somewhere, most likely in Arabia, Paul’s personality had been transfigured. Never after that was he listed as a backslider. He was too occupied with going on. It would have vexed his righteous soul to hear a congregation sing, “Prone to wander, Lord, I feel it!”
Unsponsored, unwelcomed, unloved — these made little difference to Paul. On he went, blind to every jewel of earthly honor, deaf to every siren-voice of ease, and insensitive to the mesmerism of worldly success.
Branded by Humility
Paul was also branded by humility. Moths could not corrupt this God-given robe. He never fished for praise with humility’s bait, but in the long line of sinners, put himself first (where we would put him last).
The old Welsh divine said that if you know Hebrew, Greek, and Latin , do not put them where Pilate did at the head of Christ, but put them at his feet. “What things were gain to me,” says Paul, “these things I count as loss for Christ.”
What a heart’s ease is the virtue of humility — the great joy of having nothing to lose! Having no opinion of himself, Paul feared no fall. He might have swaggered in the richly embroidered robes of the chancellor of a Hebrew school. But in the adornment of a meek and quiet spirit, he shines with more luster.
Branded by Suffering
Next, Paul was branded by suffering. Consider the thing he mentions in Romans 8: famine, peril, nakedness, and sword (these belonging to acute discomfort in the body), and tribulation (perhaps of the mind), distress, persecution (of the spirit). Of all these sufferings the “little” minister partook.
This wandering Jew “made war on all that made war on God and on the children of men.” This prince of preachers and his foe, the prince of hell, spared each other no beatings. It was a free-for-all and no holds barred!
Look closely at Paul — at that cadaverous countenance, that scarred body, that stooped figure of a man chastened by hunger, kept down by fasting, and ploughed with the lictor’s lash; that little body, brutally stoned at Lystra and starved in many places; that skin, pickled for thirty-six hours in the Mediterranean Sea!
Add to this list danger upon danger; then multiply it with loneliness; finally, count in the 199 stripes, 3 shipwrecks, 3 beatings with rods, a stoning, a prison record, and deaths so many that count is lost.
And yet if one could add it up, all must be written off as nothing, because Paul himself thus consigned it. Listen to him: “Our light affliction, which is but for a moment…” That’s contempt of suffering, if you like!
Branded by Passion
Furthermore, Paul was branded by passion. A man must be in the dead center of God’s will and walking the tightrope of obedience to call upon the Holy Ghost to bear witness to his witness. Yet Paul does this in Romans 9:1.
Oh, that from this wondrous flame every living preacher might capture just a little light! Beatings could not cast the flame out of Paul; fastings and hunger could not kill it; misunderstanding and misrepresentation could not quench its fire; waters could not drown it; prisons could not break it; perils could not arrest its growth. On and on it burned, until life ebbed from his body.
The living Christ who was within Paul (Gal. 2:20), as manifested by his soul-passion, was at once the despair of hell, the capital for enlarging the Church, and cheer to the heart of the Saviour, who was seeing the travail of His soul and was being satisfied.
Branded by Love
Paul was branded by love. When Paul experienced becoming a “man in Christ,” he developed the capacity for love. Only maturity knows love. How Paul loved!
First and supremely, Paul loved his Lord. Then he loved men, his enemies, hardship, and soul-pain. And he must have loved this latter particularly, else he would have shirked prayer. Paul’s love carried him to the lost, the last, the least. What scope of love! Mars’ Hill with its intellectuals, the synagogues with their religious traditionalists, the market places with their prodigals — all these he yearned over and sought for his Lord. Like a mighty dynamo, love pushed him on to attempt great things for God.
Not many have prayed as this man prayed. Maybe McCheyne, John Fletcher, mighty Brainerd, and a few others have known something of the soul-and-body mastering work of intercession motivated by love.
I remember standing by the Marechale once as we sang her great hymn:
“There is a love constraining me
To go and seek the lost;
I yield, O Lord, my all to Thee
To save at any cost!”
That was not just a lovely sentiment. It cost her prison, privation, pain, and poverty.
Charles Wesley seemed to reach on tiptoe when he said, “nothing on earth do I desire but Thy pure love within my breast!” More recently Amy Carmichael uttered the heartfelt prayer; “Give me a love that leads the way, a faith which nothing can dismay!” These men and women were certainly on the trail of the apostolic secret of soul-winning.
Great soul-winners have always been great lovers of men’s souls. All lesser loves were conquered only by the greater Love. Great love to the Lover of their souls drove them to tears, to travail, and to triumph. In this evil hour, dare we love less?
Let me love Thee, love is mighty
Swaying realms of deed and thought;
By it I can walk uprightly,
I can serve Thee as I ought.
Love will soften every trial
Love will lighten every care;
Love unquestioning will follow,
Love will triumph, love will dare!
Without any of their choosing, millions will be branded for the Antichrist one day. Shall we shrink to bear in our spirits, our souls, and our bodies our Owner’s marks — the marks of Jesus? Branded means pain. Do we want that? Branded means carrying the slur of the servant. Will we choose to be branded — for Christ?
The Virgin Birth~Matthew 1:18-25
Open your Bible with me, if you will to Matthew chapter 1, Matthew chapter 1. And we’re looking this evening at verses 18 to 25 of this first chapter. We began last week a study in the record of Matthew, the record really of the life of Jesus Christ is recorded by the evangelist Matthew, commonly known as the Gospel of Matthew. You’re going to find that every element of life will be touched by this Book, tremendously, forceful, powerful statement on the person of Jesus Christ, and the principles that God has ordained for human existence. But in our lesson for tonight we come to verses 18 to 25, and these verses deal with the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. Matthew begins his Gospel by considering Christ. And it’s a very important passage, let me read it to you, you follow along as I read. “Now the birth of Jesus Christ was in this way: When, as his mother, Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit.
Then Joseph, her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privately. And while he thought on these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary, thy wife; for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS; for he shall save his people from their sins. Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel, which, being interpreted, is God with us. Then Joseph, being raised from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife, And knew her not till she had brought forth her first-born son; and he called his name JESUS.”
Now in Matthew chapter 22 verse 42, Jesus asks the Pharisees a question that has been, been voiced in every generation since then. Jesus said, “What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he? What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he? That’s the question Jesus asked in Matthew 22:42, and it’s a question that needs to be asked in every age, to every person. Whose son is He? Now the Jewish leaders believed that the promised Messiah would be the son of David. They believed that from a human viewpoint He would be a member of the royal lineage of David, the royal family, the royal line. And frankly they weren’t sure of much more than that. Ah, they for the most part seemed to reject the idea that the Messiah would be God in human flesh, though there may be some indication that a few of them may have felt that way.
The preponderance of the Jewish people at that time seemed to have been convinced that the King they were going to gain would be of the seed of David, a human being in every sense of royal lineage. In fact when Jesus claimed to be both the son of David and the Son of God, they accused Him of blasphemy. They expected Him to be of the royal line of David but apparently not to be deity, in human flesh. And I think people today are still denying that. I, I think people today are willing to let Jesus be a royal seed, they’re willing to let Him be a son of David, they’re willing let…to let Him be even one of a kingly line but they’re not anxious for Him to be deity, God in human flesh. It’s all right to be the son of David, but not the Son of God. And even at Christmas time I am reminded of a carol which they sing that says this, Christ by highest heaven adored, Christ the everlasting Lord, late in time behold Him come, offspring of the virgin’s womb, veiled in flesh the Godhead see, hail the Incarnate Deity, pleased as man with men to dwell, Jesus our Immanuel, hark the herald angels sing, glory to the new born King. Now that verse of that particular Christmas carol is a verse that is built around the theme that He is God. And even though the world may sing the song, they’re not really ready to receive the reality of it.
To show you that Redbook Magazine over ten years ago took a poll of students in Protestant seminaries, 56% of the students in Protestant seminaries studying for the ministry rejected the idea of the virgin birth, 56%. The legacy of that poll and those students ten years ago is modern liberalism. The Survey Research Center of the University of California at Berkeley polled the denominations to get their view on the virgin birth, 69% of the American Baptists believed in the virgin birth, 66% of the Lutherans believed in the virgin birth, 57% of the United Presbyterians, 39% of the Episcopalians, 34% of the Methodists, and 21% of the Congregationalists believed in the virgin birth of Jesus Christ.
Now the church in, in many, many ways, the church not evangelical but the church liberal is not even ready to accept the deity of Jesus Christ, and His virgin birth so it seems rather obvious that the world isn’t beating a path to the door of this great concept in reality. But you shouldn’t be surprised, the Apostle Paul said in Romans chapter 3 these words, “For what if some did not believe? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, and every man (what?) a liar.” So says Paul in Romans 3:3 and 4.
Don’t ever base your theology on majority rule. There may be people who deny the virgin birth, there may be people who flagrantly and blatantly fight against the deity of Jesus Christ, but maybe even more subtle than that are the people who ignore the virgin birth. Reading a quote by someone that you all know, Robert Schuller at Garden Grove Community Church, this is a quote from the Wittenberg door January 1976 he said quote, “I could not in print or in public deny the virgin birth of Christ, but when I have something I can’t comprehend I just don’t deal with it.” End quote. Well, maybe that is the most serious error of all. Because that’s very subtle.
To just ignore the virgin birth. We cannot doubt it, and we cannot deny it and we cannot ignore it if we simply open our eyes and look at Matthew 1 verses 18 to 25, it’s there. Doctor Walvoord the president of Dallas Theological Seminary says, and I quote, “The incarnation of the Lord Jesus Christ is the central fact of Christianity, upon it the whole superstructure of Christian theology depends.” End quote. The whole essence of Christianity people, is predicated on the fact that Jesus is God in human flesh, and that is something made clear at the very birth of Christ, an essential doctrine.
You see if Jesus had a human father then the Bible is untrustworthy, because the Bible claims He did not. And if Jesus was born simply of human parents, there is no way to describe the reason for His supernatural life. His virgin birth, His substitutionary death, His bodily resurrection and His second coming are a package of deity, you cannot isolate any one of those and accept only that one and leave the rest, or vice versa, accept them all but one. You believe all of those realities that are the manifestation of His deity or you do not. And so we must face the question that Jesus posed to the Pharisees again, whose son is He?
Now Matthew gives us the human answer to whose son he is in the genealogy which we studied last week. Humanly speaking whose son is He? Son of David. Now this week we look at the next section and we have the divine answer in verses 18 to 25, whose Son is He? Son of God. Son of David, humanity, Son of God, deity. Both of those are essential to an understanding of the incarnation. Jesus is God in a human body. Humanly through the lineage of David He gains the right to rule the world, and from the standpoint of deity He gains the very essence of the nature of God by having been born without a human father through the agency of the Spirit of God Himself. And so Matthew in writing his Gospel squarely faces his Jewish readers and all the readers of aIl the ages, and he gives them the answer. The genealogy of Jesus tells you whose son He is, David. And the birth of Jesus tells you whose Son He is, God.
Now if Matthew 1:1 to 17 the genealogy were all that could be said, then Christ may have had the legal right to be the King, but He could have never redeemed men, He could have never conquered death, He could have never conquered sin, He could have never conquered Satan and hell. For that He had to be God, and so Jesus was the God-man, 100% deity, 100% humanity, that is the message of chapter one of Matthew, and so he splits his chapter into two parts dealing with the human and then the divine.
Now let me add a footnote that you might think about. Matthew may be writing in an apologetic manner. And by that I don’t mean he was apologizing for what he was saying. Apologetics comes from a Greek word apologia which means a speech in defense of, and it may be that Matthew is actually writing here not simply just to lay out the facts: but that he is really writing to counter a certain thing that was going on. He is really writing to counter a certain slander.
For example, we know that at the time of Jesus Christ there were some who accused Him of being an illegitimate son, a child born out of wedlock, the son of a Roman soldier who cohabitated with Mary, and Mary was an adulteress, and thus Jesus was an illegitimate child. Those kind of slanders were in existence at that time. And it may have been that Matthew was not just pedantically recording the facts of the birth of Christ, but that he was countering a slander that existed about his dear Lord. And this text sets such a slander right.
The virgin birth is essential enough for the Apostles’ Creed to speak of Jesus as conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the virgin Mary. That’s always been a cardinal fact of Christianity, and it’s always been one that is attacked by false doctrine.
Now the world has had its unusual births. I mean I remember back in…reading about the first quintuplets, I think they were the Dionne quintuplets born about 1934, long before I was ever ev…a twinkle in my father’s eye. And we in our own lifetime in the United States have seen the, the…I think it was the Fisher quintuplets and then more recently about 1973 the San…Stanic sextuplets, we’ve seen some unusual births is the point.
I remember when our first little guy Matthew was born and we thought we really had a, a monstrosity, what was he honey? Ten pounds and two ounces or something and he was a good healthy kid. And at the same day we thought boy, I bet…you know how gathers…we got the biggest kid in the place, right? Run right out and bought him a football. And ah, I read in the paper the same day there was a baby born sixteen pounds and some odd ounces. Now that is a baby: that is a baby folks. I mean there have been some unusual births, we are aware of that, but there is no birth ever in the history of humanity that is as singularly spectacular as the birth of Jesus Christ.
And any rejection of Christ’s supernatural origin leaves His supernatural life and His supernatural death and His supernatural resurrection inexplicable. You gotta have it all, or any of it to make sense. And if Jesus wasn’t virgin born, then the claim that He can save is highly questionable. So Matthew to begin with affirms the virgin birth.
Now let’s look at five features, five distinct elements appearing in the narrative. And I like to take a narrative like this and even though it isn’t divided up in terms of logical thought, it’s just a narrative, but if we divide it up we can kind of get a look at the single ah, highlights of it, and that’s the purpose in doing that and there’s probably an outline in a bulletin if you have one there you could follow. But we see five things, the virgin birth conceived, confronted: clarified, connected and consummated. Those are not profound words they’re just hooks to hang your thoughts on. First of all, the virgin birth conceived, then confronted, then clarified, then connected and then consummated.
Now by the way, it’s most interesting, how certain liberal theologians deal with this problem here. They say, well, yes, we do agree that of course this is an account of a virgin birth, but after all Matthew was written by a well meaning fellow who was not inspired by God. And they tell us that at the time in which Matthew wrote, they don’t know what time that was as I told you last time, there’s about a 30 year possibility, but around that time from 40 to 70 A.D., around that time they say there were a lot of virgin birth myths floating around. And it just so happened that is was a kind of a popular thought and so when Matthew wanted to lay out his deal on Jesus, he just snatched one out of the air and incorporated it here. Because there were so many virgin birth myths floating around.
You want to know something? There have always been a lot of virgin birth myths floating around, guess who made ’em up? Satan: why? He is the master what? Counterfeiter, deceiver.
So it’s always been those things, let me give you an illustration of one. By the way, uhm, writers from as far back as Origen who wrote early on in the Christian era, writers from then to the present, uhm, have shown us very clearly the foul character of such tales, they’re very, very questionable: I mean there’s just no comparison.
I’ll give you an illustration. There was a legend that Alexander the Great, you remember Alexander the Great, son of Philip of Macedon, Alexander the Great conquered the world, ah, taking the world from the Medo-Persians, he swept east with a great army and conquered the world for Greece. Well, Alexander the Great, it was claimed was virgin born, okay? Here’s the story, a serpent snake was once seen sharing the bed of Olympas, now Olympas. was the wife of Philip of Macedon. So she cohabitated with a snake. And of course we all know if we know anything about Greek legend who that snake was. There was one of the Greek gods who more than any other was a sexual deviate. Whenever there’s some weird sexual thing, you can always figure that it was Zeus, he had a problem. And so frequently in Greek culture you find the god Zeus ah, taking the form of an animal for some strange cohabitation, and that’s what they say occurred in the case of Alexander the Great, uh, this was Zeus in the form of a snake, crawled in bed with Olympias and made Olympias pregnant, and Zeus also appeared often as a bird and sometimes he even appeared as foam on the sea, knocking ships over and things, strange stuff. But anyway, what the legend says is that when Philip of Macedon discerned what his wife had done his own sexual desire was dulled and hence the product of the union had to have been born of the snake, and it was none other than Alexander and thus Alexander the Great was the child of Zeus. That is the virgin birth story of Alexander the Great. A filthy, vile, inconceivable, asinine, not to be compared story with that of the Word of God.
Now to say that Matthew just happened to find a few of those deals up in the air and yanked one down and slapped it on Jesus’ life is to do two things, number one, it’s to accuse Matthew of being a blatant liar, and number two, it’s to say that the Word of God is in fact not the Word of God, but the word of man. This story is history beloved, not fantasy, it is history.
Now, there wasn’t really a lot of talk about the Messiah being virgin born. I mean they didn’t really see that, even though it was sort of veiled in the Old Testament and even though there was Isaiah 7:14 and there were other passages that maybe kind of la…leaned that way. But they didn’t really see that, but there was evidence and I want you to note this in your mind, there was Old Testament evidence that the Messiah would be God.
Now it was veiled, and it wasn’t just flat out, but there were at least indications in the Old Testament that the Messiah would be deity. And we’re not going to take time to go into those, but just take that and put it in your, in your file somewhere up in your mind. But it was very vague. And it wasn’t until the New Testament that the full mystery of Godliness, that God was manifest in the flesh was really unfolded, it became crystal clear in the New Testament. Naturally then, if it is clear in the New Testament that Jesus is God in human flesh, then what will be the number one point of attack of every false system? The deity of Jesus Christ, invariably they all do it. Now the facts are clear in the narrative, they are here to support the fact that very…from the very beginning, Jesus was the Son of God, God in human flesh. No matter what the Jews may or may not have believed, no matter what the legends were, no matter what the critics said, no matter what the slander said, Matthew records the facts.
Now let’s see how this incredible event occurred. First of all, point number one, the virgin birth conceived, verse 18, the virgin birth conceived. This miracle is so incredible, that I hope you haven’t heard it so often that your senses are dulled to the spectacular unbelievable supernaturalness of this thing. Verse 18, “Now the birth of Jesus Christ was in this way: When, as his mother, Mary, was espoused (or betrothed) to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child by the Holy Spirit.” Now we’ll stop there. Now here you have the virgin birth conceived. Here the Spirit of God through the writer Matthew tells us that Mary was impregnated by the Holy Spirit.
Now let me just show you something about the verse that I think is fascinating, see the word “birth,” the word birth at the beginning? That is the very same Greek word as the word in verse 1 of chapter 1, where it says, “The book of the genealogy,” it is the same word for genealogy. In other words: he is simply giving you the genealogy of Jesus from the divine side, 1:1, “The book of the genealogy, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” Over here, “Now the genealogy of Jesus Christ was in this way.” And this is the divine side, He was conceived by the Holy Spirit of God, see? Just two sides of the same genealogy.
The genealogy of Jesus Christ was in this manner, “When his mother, Mary,” and we don’t know much about Mary, I wish we knew more about her we don’t know much about Mary.
Let me see if I can kind of put some things together for you. Uhm, it may be, this is uh, a real possibility, let me Just see if I can find that verse for you, John 19:25 I think it is, you don’t need to look it up. “There stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary, of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.” Now we don’t know much about Mary, but apparently Mary had a sister, the wife of Clopas who also was named Mary, which is not necessarily uncommon. So we know at least one person in the immediate family, and it is also true, according to Luke chapter 1 and verse 36, listen to this, “And, behold, (it says) thy cousin, Elisabeth, has also conceived a son.” And who was her son? John the Baptist. So we know at least a sister: it is very likely that that reference there is referring to a regular blood sister in John 19, and we know of her cousin Elisabeth, so we know a little bit about her family, and if we can take the genealogy of Luke and assign it to Mary’s family her father’s name was ah, Heli, H-e-1-i. She and Elisabeth being related thus Jesus and John the Baptist were also related. Now we don’t know much about Mary other than that, her early life was spent in Nazareth, she was probably poor, probably hard working, and no doubt a very righteous lady. I think if you want a good character study of Mary: you can just simply listen to her.
In Luke 1 you have a parallel account of the enunciation and all of that. And of course when Mary found out what the Spirit of God had done and what was going to happen you know, it said, “The Spirit of God will come upon you, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow you; and that which is born of you shall be called the Son of God.” Luke 1:35, you’re going to have a child, and it’s going to be the Son of God, deity. And verse 38 tells us about Mary’s character, because of her response, “And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word.” Now what do you learn about Mary right there? She submitted to what? God’s what? God’s word.
Verse 45, and Mary, it says, “And blessed is she that believed.” Blessed is she that believed. Elisabeth and Mary having a conversation. We learn a second thing about Mary, not only did she submit to the word of God but she was a woman of what? Faith, she believed God.
Now listen ladies, if an angel came and told you that, would you just say, be it unto you even as the word of God has said. would somebody say, “Ohhh, what a great person of faith, she must have been a great,”… you know most women would have said, “Say Joseph, I had this weird dream. I’ve gotta go see a counselor.” She believed, great lady of faith.
And by the way, I would just remind you that that kind of faith is characteristic of a righteous person, a person who submits to the authority of the Word of God and who lives by faith in that Word even when it makes absolutely no sense, and there was no human historical precedent on which she could say, this is true, that’s a woman who’s righteous. She accepted it, and most lovely was her Magnificat as the Bible, or as history has called it. “And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord.” Luke 1:46. “My spirit hath rejoiced. For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden; for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name.” Oh, what a godly lady, there was no quizzical thing in her mind, there was no doubt; there was no misgiving; there was no pondering; there was no wondering, there was no questioning, there was an instant submission and an instant belief that this in fact was God’s truth. What a righteous lady. She was so plugged into God, she was a true Old Testament saint, that she could sense when God was speaking. And she went on to praise God for what He was going to do.
It might be interesting for you to know it, do you know what the word Mary is in Greek? The word Mary in Greek is Miriam, and do you know what the root meaning is? Rebelliousness. Poor lady, badly named, she wasn’t rebellious.
Now she was married…or betrothed look back at verse 18, it says she was betrothed to Joseph. Now Joseph, we don’t know anything about, background. We just don’t know anything. He is described by a Greek term that can be translated carpenter or mason. And it may have been that a man did both, if he built houses he would need to be able to lay the bricks and frame the windows too, and the doors, so perhaps he did both. But he was an undoubtedly a poor hard working man, and I’m quite confident he was a righteous man, it says in verse 19, “Joseph, her husband, being a righteous man.” He too was a godly man* he was a true Old Testament saint, so here are two Old Testament saints.
Now they were very young, most Bible scholars feel they were in their teen years since marriages in that day and age occurred to ladies as young as, would you believe 12? The betrothals occurred when girls were 12 and I3. And so they were most likely older teen-agers because we sense that because of the tremendous maturity of Mary.
And it says there, look at the word exp…espoused, we get the word spouse from that, but it is in the Greek betrothed. Now what does this mean? We’ve had a lot of discussion about it. What, what do you mean they were betrothed? Does that mean they were engaged, does that mean they were going steady, and Mary wore Joseph’s ring around her neck on a chain, what does it mean? Wore his letterman’s jacket. What does it mean?
Mary and Joseph were betrothed. Well I’ll give you a little background. The Old Testament and the rabbis as well in the rabbinical writings distinguish two stages in marriage, in Hebrew marriage. Two, one is called the Kiddushin. the other is the Huppa, or the Huppa, didn’t say that H properly. The Kiddushin and the Huppa. Now the Kiddushin was the betrothal and it…what it was, Deuteronomy chapter 20 verse 7 tells you about it, if you want to jot that down, Deuteronomy 20:7. What it was, was two families would draw up a contract, or two individuals could do it, draw up a contract that promised marriage, okay? It was, now watch this, a binding contract, and if at any time during that contract of betrothal period you violated that marriage vow you had to be divorced in an official sense. You were constituted legally married though there were no physical relationships whatever. It was a normally twelve month period, and it was a period of protection for the would be husband and wife, so that there would be a period in which to prove a fidelity. So that if the girl was pregnant that would become very manifest in that period. If anybody was going to be unfaithful or there were going to be problems, there was a period of time in which that could be worked out. And by the way, during that period, there was not a lot of social contact at all. They still maintained a certain distance, it was simply a promise that was made, a contract that was made.
Now, at the end of the period, it could go as long as 12 months sometimes 6 months, the Huppa took place, that was the wedding, and weddings lasted approximately 7 days. You think you got it tough now father, when you marry off your daughter how would you like to have the neighborhood over for 7 days? You gotta feed ’em, provide drink for ’em, that’s the marriage at Cana, remember what happened? They ran out of wine, right? One of the reasons that when you ah, when you gave your daughter away to be married, you wanted something in payment for her was of course to take care of some of your own needs, so there was what was called the mohar, that was the price. And the price of the girl would vary, depending on the girl, you know, it could be anything from a couple dozen sheep to a lame chicken I suppose. But anyway, there may have been some girls that just…you could say, you can have ’em for nothin’, I’ll throw in a couple sheep, you know?
But basically, basically there was what was called the mohar, and this was the price that was paid, and ah, it was paid at the point of betrothal, it was usually…according to Genesis 3?, it was goods or services. And it had several purposes, number one was to compensate the father, because the father would have to expend a great amount of money in order to marry his daughter off. It was also to act as life insurance for the wife, and normally the Jewish father would hold it in trust and if the husband died he would give it back to the daughter. And it also was kind of a divorce insurance. Because the husband of course would have to give it up: and you know, it usually was a rather formidable price and he had no hope of ever realizing it back again unless he stayed married to the girl and received it back by inheritance after the death of the father. So, it, it tended to keep the marriage together plus you couldn’t run around and marry too many people or you’d be destitute, givin’ all your stuff away.
So the betrothal period then was the period prior to the Huppa or the wedding itself when the marriage was consummated physically and all. The betrothal period was a period of testing, a period of probation to insure the brides virginity and the fidelity of the husband and wife and so forth. But they used the term husband and wife, because th…it was as good as valid, just not consummated, and you’ll note that because it says in verse uh, 25, “He knew her not till she had brought forth her first-born son.” And verse 18 says, “before they came together.” In other words it was in this betrothal period that Mary was made to be with child by the Holy Spirit.
So that there would be absolutely no question about whether Joseph was the father, and Joseph was a godly man, a righteous man who would not have violated God’s standard. You know God looks with great concern on purity, and virginity is of high value to God, it’s a sacred thing, not something to be trifled with. And I’m reminded of how beautiful and lovely and sacred virginity is when I see in the case of Mary, how honored she was because of it. And so she was found with child, by the Holy Spirit. Now Mary knew it, Mary knew this. Now we don’t have the Luke account in this text so let’s look at Luke 1 and let’s find out how Mary found out.
Luke chapter 1 verse 26, “And in the sixth month the angel, Gabriel,” oh of course this is six months after Elisabeth conceived so Mary was made pregnant in Elisabeth’s six months, month so that John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus, which gave him just enough time to get the ball rolling. “And in the sixth month the angel, Gabriel, was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth.” This is where Mary lived, in fact if you go to Nazareth, Nazareth today you’ll go to a place and they’ll tell you this is the well where Mary used to draw water when she was little, don’t you believe it. Verse 27, “Go see a virgin espoused to a man (again betrothed, the Bible’s very clear about this, the marriage was not consummated) whose name was Joseph, of the house of David: and the virgin’s name was Mary. And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou who art highly favored, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women. And when she saw him, she was troubled … well I can guess, little old simple girl up there in hayseed part of the country, where everybody was a farmer, and it wasn’t even Jerusalem, it was kind of insignificant and all of a sudden an angel, great glorious angel, not just any old angel but Gabriel, Gabriel the hero of Yahweh, Gabriel comes in and says, Hail, Mary, highly favored, blessed art thou among women.
And when she saw him she was troubled at the saying, considered in her mind what manner of greeting this should be.” What in the world is he saying? I’m nobody. “And the angel said, ‘Now, don’t be afraid, Mary: for you have found favor with God. And, behold, you will conceive in your womb, and bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father, David. And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever: and of his kingdom there shall be no end.’ Then said Mary unto the angel, ‘How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?'” You see here is Mary affirming her virgin…her virginity. “And the angel answered, and said unto her, ‘The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall (not only be called the son of David, but what?) Son of God.'” I mean what an incredible announcement. To just a nobody lady living in a little dinky place called Nazareth. And so, Mary knew it, and when she became pregnant she knew why.
Poor Joseph, he didn’t know. When he found out it was a shock, it was a shock. It jolted him, he knew Mary, see? I mean he knew this girl, that he was betrothed to, he knew the quality of her character, he knew the righteous standard by which she lived, he knew her, her stature before God, he knew Mary, this was totally out of character. It made chapter no sense at all. And he knew Deuteronomy chapter 22 well enough to know that back then when a woman became pregnant with a child outside of wedlock the punishment was what? Death, death.
In Deuteronomy chapter 22 there are many verses, let me just remind you of some that speak to this issue. Deuteronomy 22:13, “If a man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her, And give occasion of speech against her, and bring up an evil name on her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came into her, I found her not a virgin;” Well if he finds that to be true, “Then they shall, (verse 21) bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of the city shall stone her with stones that she die, because she’s wrought folly in Israel, to play the harlot.” And of course there are other things involved in-between, there’s…this whole chapter deals with various kinds of harlotry. Verse 22, “If a (mound) man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman. Put away the evil. If a damsel is a virgin be betrothed to a husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her, Then bring them to the gate and stone them.” So it covered every element of this, death would have been what happened then, and Joseph was literally rocked to the very core of his heart.
He loved Mary. And Mary had, you see absolutely no way under the sun to protect her reputation. She’s gonna’ go out and say, listen folks, uhm, this baby is conceived by God. And they’re gonna’ say, uh-huh, that’s a new one Mary, we’ve heard .em all, that’s a new one. She has no way to protect her reputation. So the blessed Spirit of God protected it for her, right here in the pages of the Word of God. Let there be no reproach on Mary ever. If Jesus is an ordinary man, if Jesus is simply just like all the other men then we can say, He was probably born like all the other men, but He isn’t like anybody else, and He wasn’t born like anybody else. If He is simply the illegitimate child of Mary’s infidelity or if He is the child of Joseph’s natural sexual activity with Mary then He is not God, and if He’s not God His claims are lies, and if His claims are lies His salvation is a hoax, and if His salvation is a hoax we are damned.
So Matthew records for us clearly that God entered the flesh by a virgin, in which seed was planted by the Holy Spirit. You say, well how does that work? Don’t ask me that. People always want to ask those kind of questions, people always ask the questions you can’t answer. I’ll never forget the times when I’d be teaching on the Book of Revelation, and I’ll say, you know and the Word of God says that the Lord is going to give you a name which no man knows, and invariably someone would come up and say, what is that name? I don’t even understand how normal human birth works, and I don’t know any Doctor who really understands the mystery of it. Don’t ask me how this works. God did it.
So a cloud of suspicion and a cloud of shame and a cloud of scandal soon hung ominously over Mary. In all of human history there’d never been a virgin birth. When people saw an unwed mother there was only one conclusion, that’s all, except in this case. There was another conclusion, the Holy Spirit, nothing new for the Holy Spirit in this sense, His was always a work of creation, wasn’t it? In Genesis 1 He brooded over the emptiness and the nothingness and He created everything. In Acts chapter 1 He moved upon the situation of people gathered in the upper room and He created the church, and why shouldn’t He be able to create the marvelous miracle of the virgin birth?
And don’t be shocked, don’t be shocked, we should have expected it, really go all the way back to the first Book of the Bible, the third chapter, Genesis, Genesis chapter 3 verse 15, now we’re way back folks. And when the, the Lord God is speaking here to Satan, Satan has done what he did in causing Adam and Eve to fall, and God says to him, “I will put–Genesis 3:15–I will put enmity, or animosity or antagonism or hatred–it’s the word for enemy really, I will put…make an enemy–between thee and the woman, (now watch) between thy seed (and what?) her seed: he shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” He said, look Satan, someday there’s gonna’ come a woman, and that woman is gonna’ have a seed and you may bruise His heel, and he did at Calvary, but He’ll do what? He’ll bruise your head, and you notice that it says Jesus would be the seed of the woman, her seed. Only one time in the history of the world did a woman ever have a seed. The seed is in the man, but once in the woman and that’s what Genesis 3:15 said. And Paul says in Galatians 4:4, he said, “In the fullness of time, Christ came, (watch this) made of a woman, made under the law.” Made of a woman. Bypassing the curse of Jeconiah, as we saw in our last study.
Now listen to me, now get this, if Jesus had had no human parents then He wouldn’t have been man at all, He, He wouldn’t have been partaker of our flesh. On the other hand, if Jesus had two human parents He could not have avoided the contamination of humanity. So He had to be the child of man and yet the child of God, and that’s exactly what He was. He was born of a sinner and yet He was sinless because He was equally born of God, deity canceled humanity’s curse, the water of the nature of God drown the fire of the nature of man. And so the virgin birth conceived.
Second point, the virgin birth confronted. What about poor Joseph? He doesn’t know what’s happening, his little world has just come to an end. Joseph, a just and righteous man, no doubt deeply committed to Mary waiting with anticipation the day when they both are proven during the period of betrothal and can come together to consummate the marriage. What about Joseph, verse 19, “Then Joseph, her husband'” notice he’s in the called a husband even though they were still/betrothal period, “being a just (or righteous) man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privately.”
Now all of a sudden we see the virgin birth confronted. Joseph has to confront this thing, he has to face it and the miracle is just very, very unclear to him, he doesn’t understand it. He was jolted. And he was a, he was a just man, and he didn’t want to put her away, he didn’t want to make her a public example.
Those are two participles by the way, two participles describing the character of Joseph, he was a just man and he was not willing to make her a public example. What do you mean he was a just man? It means he was a righteous Jew, he was again a true Old Testament saint, godly man. And you know what a godly man would say to himself? I can’t marry this lady in this condition. She’s violated the principles of God, even though I care about her, even though I don’t understand this thing, even though everything is a mystery to me I, I…as a just man I must do what the law requires.
To call him a just man puts him in the same class with Zacharias and Elisabeth, because the Bible says that, “They were righteous before God, walking in all His commandments and ordinances, blameless.” It puts him in the category of Simeon of whom the Scripture says, “He was righteous and devout.” He was a real God fearing Jew, and he knew that he had to be obedient to God’s laws, and God’s laws say, when somebody does that there are consequences. Joseph was a true saint.
So his first prompting came from his righteousness, but his second prompting came from his concern, and it says he was not willing to make her a public example. Now he had that option, two courses were open to Joseph in this day and age. Had he been living in the day that Deuteronomy was written they would have required one thing, but the laxness of Jewish…of the Jewish view of theocracy, the laxness with which they kept the law of God had brought it about to this point where they had substituted less stringent laws for the ones that God had ordained, and that’s why their country got into so much trouble because they violated God’s laws which were preventatives. And here in this lax day there were two things open to Joseph, one was to make her a public example. And that is how they…this is how they did it, he would charge her openly in a public court with having committed adultery, she would be shamed, she would be brought to trial, she would be convicted in front of everybody, ruined in terms of reputation.
The other possibility was that they provided for a more quiet way, the two parties could get together before two or three witnesses and write out a private bill of divorcement, such as is indicated in Deuteronomy 24. And they would write out this private little bill of divorcement, there would be no judicial procedure, there would be no public knowledge, there would be no fanfare, nobody would need to know, it was stated at that time that you did not even need to write the cause for the divorce in the statement, so that she could go away without anybody ever really knowing what had happened. It was done secretly. Now this wasn’t necessarily God’s pattern, but this is what was allowable in the laxness of the day in which Joseph lived, so he had those options.
By the way, the word put her away, see, it says, “He was minded to put her away privately.” Put her away is apoluo, it’s the New Testament word for divorce, he had to divorce her, that…because the betrothal was constituted as marriage. And he said, well, I’ll put her away privately. He just couldn’t bring himself to making Mary a public example, he just couldn’t bring himself to public scorn and public shame, so he wanted to put her away privately.
But he had a hard time doing that. He just couldn’t get it to the very act, so it says in verse 20, “And while he thought on these things,” stop right there. No doubt he went to his bed in his own home in Nazareth, they’re still in Nazareth here, and he was meditating and he was mulling over what he had to do, and while he was mulling it over he fell asleep, he fell asleep.
And then we find the virgin birth clarified, clarified. The virgin birth clarified in verse ?O look what happened, he falls asleep, he’s confronted it, it’s confusing him, he falls asleep and, “Behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream,” now I just want you to understand something, this is not a dream like you have a dream, this is not a dream where what you see isn’t real, it’s imaginary, somehow in some way in a dream kind of revelation the dream turns into something real, it was a real angel and he really saw that angel.
And by the way this is not uncommon to Matthew, uhm, there are at least 6, in fact there are only 6 other times where we find this kind of communication. Uh, Matthew chapter 2 has several, Matthew, yeah, Matthew 1 here, Matthew 2, Matthew 27, and the other ones in Acts 2:17 where it’s a prophetic.
So this is not in a totally isolated situation, God sometimes uses an angel in a dream. And Joseph wasn’t dreaming it in the sense you think of it, he fell asleep, began to dream and his dream turned to a reality. “And the angel said to him, Joseph, thou son of David,” and I know why he said that second part, just to reinforce, just to reinforce the lineage and the line of David. Boy, that must have been something to hear. Thou son of David. He says this, “don’t be afraid to take unto you Mary, your wife; for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.” You don’t have to be afraid Joseph, that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.
This is the great reality people of the virgin birth, there was no human father. This is the birth of God in human flesh. He is both man and God, and that’s why for example in the Old Testament He’s called Tsemaeh which means the branch, and did you note that He is called the branch of David in one passage and in another one, the branch of Jehovah, see? He’s the offspring of David, and He is the offspring of God. And did you know in Isaiah 9:6 He is called, “Wonderful, Counselor, The Mighty (what?) God, the Father of eternity.”
And so, Joseph was to know that he had no fear in taking Mary, for what was conceived in her was of the Holy Spirit. And verse 21 gives him further instruction, “She shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS:” In Hebrew Jeshua, Joshua, Jehoshua, which means Jehovah shall save. And His name will be Jesus, “for he shall save his people from their sins.” Now I want you to notice something about verse 21, “She shall bring forth a son.” You notice he doesn’t say, and Joseph, you will have a son. She brought forth that child, and His name shall be Jesus, for He shall save His people, from your sins.
You know the Bible is very careful about never naming Joseph as the father of Jesus, I don’t know if you know that. For example in Matthew 2:13 it says, “Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee to Egypt.” Always the mother. Why didn’t he say, take your child and your wife? Why the child and the mother, always Joseph is removed from the actual fatherhood. 2:20 of Matthew, “Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go to the land of Israel.” It’s always the child and His mother, never Joseph as the father. Virgin born, and His name Jeshua, Jehoshua, Jesus, for He shall save His people from their sins.
Beloved, that’s the reason He came, isn’t it? And that’s why the Book of Acts in chapter 4 verse 12 says, “Neither is there salvation in any other; for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” Only the name of Jesus, the one God man. It is God alone who saves. Like Psalm 20 says, there are some people who trust in horses, and some people who trust in chariots, and some who trust in physical strength, and some who trust in their knowledge, and their intuition, and their reputation, and their prestige, their position, machinery, friends, whatever it is, education, but only Jesus can save. He shall save His people from their sins. Only He is mighty enough to save.
So, the virgin birth conceived, confronted, clarified. Fourth, and we’ll hurry to a close. The virgin birth connected, the virgin birth connected, just so that it doesn’t appear as if some, some last minute afterthought, some deal grabbed out of the air like the critics said, some floating myth that was attached to Jesus, Matthew comes in with a commentary in verses 22 and 23, the narrative breaks here, the angel isn’t speaking anymore, Matthew talks and this is what he says, and he does this all through Matthew, in fact fifty times in the Gospel of Matthew he quotes the Old Testament, seventy-six additional times he alludes to it. And this is a formula that he uses. “Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet,” and whenever the prophet spoke it was the Lord, “saying,” and he quotes Isaiah 7:14, “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel, which, being interpreted, is God with us.” There is the virgin birth connected to the Old Testament. This is not an afterthought, this is not the pulling of a legend out of the air, this is the promise of God fulfilled. A tremendous thing. They should have known.
Now all this was done that it might be filled up, that it might be made full, that it might be accomplished, just exactly as Isaiah said. Now we could have a great big long drawn out thing about what did Isaiah say, and why did he use the word Almah instead of the word Bethulah, and did he mean virgin and blah, blah, blah and on and on and on, there’s no reason to ar…no reason to argue about that at all. Suffice it to say, that the word Almah in Isaiah 7:14 is best translated virgin, best translated virgin, and the people, the critics, the slanderers can come and go and try to erase it, but they can’t erase the commentary of Matthew on it, who used the word Parthenos which meant virgin, Matthew knew what it meant even if they don’t. And it’s a little tough to get around the virgin birth when it says over and over that the, the lady Mary had no relationships with a man.
Why do they want to argue about Almah in Isaiah 7:14? Why don’t they listen to God’s commentary on it? The setting of Isaiah’s prophecy is very simple. King Ahaz was terrified that the kingdom of Judah might be destroyed by Syria and Israel, Ahaz is sitting down in the bottom southern kingdom and he’s worried about up north, here’s Israel and over here is Syria, and he’s afraid they’re gonna come down and they’re gonna wipe out the Kingly line, so he’s really afraid they’ll loose the Kingly line. So God comes along and says, let me give you a promise, nothing’s going to happen to the Kingly line, nothing is going to take away the Kingly line, here’s a sign, a virgin shall be with child and that child will be Immanuel, God with us. He says, you look down the corridors of history and there will be a virgin born child and He will guarantee you that David’s line will never be broken. And Jesus came into the world, as the fulfillment of that prophecy given by Isaiah to Ahaz, to show that God would keep His promise and the throne of David would never be broken forever and ever and ever and ever. So, the virgin birth is clarified.
By the way, “they shall call his name Immanuel, which being interpreted, is (what?) God with us.” El the last two letters of that word are His name for God, El, El Shaddai, El Elyon, El Maqodeshkim all those names for God, El. Imman…Immanu means with us, God with us. Now you say, but they never called Him Immanuel. No, that is not His title as far as a name is concerned.That is a description of who He is, and many times the title is not necessarily the name. He was called lots of things as well.He is called Immanuel.
And so, the virgin birth is clarified and then it’s connected, to history past. Fifthly, the virgin birth consummated. Verse 24, “Then Joseph, being raised from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife.” Don’t you think that was a wonderful thing? Don’t you think that was the best nap Joseph ever had? When he got up and it was all clear, oh, – it isn’t just Mary, I’m not just marrying Mary, I’m getting the Son of God thrown in on the deal.
But he must have been a good man. Can you imagine the Almighty God of the universe depositing His only Son in the home of a man who wouldn’t be a good father, can you imagine that? I can’t imagine that. I, I just feel bad that not more is said about Joseph. He must have been dead by the time Jesus died, because he doesn’t appear anywhere. And at the cross, do you remember what Jesus did? He looked down at John the beloved and He looked down at Mary, and He said, Mary behold your son, and He said, John behold your mother, and you see He gave somebody to Mary to take care of her. He’s going be gone, and no doubt Joseph was long dead, we don’t know much about Joseph, but oh, I imagine he was a wonderful man. Because I know God wouldn’t deposit His one and only Son in the home of a man who wouldn’t be a good loving father.
And he must have been a wonderful man to deal with a perfect Son. Can you imagine fathers, the frustration of that? No dad, it’s this way. When I get to heaven, two people I want to meet, Joseph and Mary. Don’t you feel that way?
Bless Joseph’s heart, what joy there must have been when he woke up. And he took Mary and they had the Huppa, the wedding ceremony. But not until after Jesus was born, “he didn’t know her till she had brought forth her first-born son:” and then he did what the angel said, the angel said, do what? “call his name JESUS.” The virgin birth consummated. They had the wedding, but he never touched Mary, physically until after that baby was born.
There’s an interesting footnote. People always say, well do you think they had other children? I know they had other children, the Bible gives the names of the other children. And John 7 talks about Jesus’ brothers. But there’s an interesting little footnote, in, in verse 25. The literal Greek is, “and he was not in the habit of knowing her until she had brought forth her first-born son.” And the implication is, that once she had brought forth her first-born son, he was in the habit of knowing her. That’s the rendering of the Greek, they had a normal human relationship, physically which produced many other children.
The supernatural birth of Jesus is the only way to account for the life that He lived. Somebody once asked a Christian, well, if I told you that a child had been born today in the city over there in that hospital without a human father, would you believe me? To which the Christian replied, yes, if he lived as Jesus lived. And that’s the fact. At the start of His life the Jews said Jesus was the Son of a man who seduced Mary, at the end of His life they said, the disciples stole His body and faked the resurrection. And Matthew begins with the answer to the first slander, and ends his Gospel with the answer to the last slander and spends the rest of the middle of it fighting all the other slanders, against the dear Lord Jesus Christ.
He was none other than God in human flesh, and Matthew tells us He came to dwell with the sick to heal them, He came to dwell with the demon possessed to liberate them, with the poor in spirit to bless them, with the care ridden to free them from care, with the lepers to cleanse them, with the diseased to cure them, with the hungry to feed them, with the handicapped to restore them, but most of all he says, that He “came to dwell with the lost, in order that he might seek and (what?) save them.” Immanuel, God with us, infinitely rich, became poor. Assumed our human nature, entered our sin polluted atmosphere without ever being tainted by it, took our guilt, bore our griefs, carried our sorrows, was wounded with our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities, went to heaven to prepare a place for us, sent His Spirit to dwell in our hearts, right now makes intercession for us, and will someday came to take us to be with Him. No wonder the Apostle Paul said, “Through his poverty we are made (what?) rich.” Well, let’s pray.
Father, what a wonder, what a wonder it is, that Jesus was thus born, the God man. Miracle of miracles that He should be man, and yet God. Thank You for the lesson too Father, that when You want to do Your special works, Your mighty works, Your supernatural works, Your miraculous works, You always find some humble, faithful, trusting, righteous people, like Mary and Joseph. Thank You, not only for the theology of the virgin birth but for the example of what happens when God uses two simple people. May we be so righteous, so useful for that which You would do today in our world in revealing Yourself. Thank You that You have chosen the weak things to confound the mighty. Thank You that we who have nothing to offer can be used by You. What a mystery.
May it so be that everyone gathered here comes to know that precious Lord Jesus who came to save people from their sins, and that in knowing Him we become humble, submissive, trusting, available people who can be used again to do Your work in this world, and we’ll give You the praise in Jesus name, Amen.
Freedom or slavery—what’s the distinguishing mark of Christianity? In a generation fixated on freedom, fulfillment, and autonomy, the vote has been cast early and often for freedom. But the Bible is abundantly clear—slavery is the heart of what it means to be a true Christian. It’s time to reassert this unpopular notion: true Christians are slaves of Christ.
Jesus is Lord (1 Corinthians 12:3) is the distinguishing article of Christianity and marks the essential confession of faith (Romans 10:9). Jesus proclaimed it to His disciples, His enemies, and His casual inquirers alike—and He refused to tone down its implications.
The expression “Lord” (kurios) speaks of ownership, while “Master/Lord” (despotes) denotes an unquestionable right to command (John 13:13; Jude 4). Both words describe a master with absolute dominion over someone else. That explains Jesus’ incredulity at the practice of those who paid homage to Him with their lips but not with their lives: “Why do you call Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?” (Luke 6:46).
Doulos frequently describes what it means to be a true Christian: “He who was called while free, is Christ’s slave [doulos]. You were bought with a price” (1 Corinthians 7:22-23). It describes the lowest, abject bond slave; his service is not a matter of choice.
A Misleading Translation
Unfortunately, readers of the English Bible have long been shielded from the full force of doulos because of an ages-old tendency to translate it as “servant” or “bond-servant.” This tendency is regrettable, since service and slavery are not the same thing. “No one can be a slave to two masters” (Matthew 6:24) makes better sense than “No one can serve two masters.” An employee with two jobs could indeed serve two masters; but a slave could not. Scripture repeatedly calls Christians “slaves” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20), purchased for God (Revelation 5:9). This is the very essence of what it means to be a Christian (Romans 14:7-9).
A Revolting Concept
Not only is slave a word loaded with negative connotations, but our generation is also fixated on the concepts of freedom, fulfillment, and autonomy. Saving faith and Christian discipleship have been reduced to the cliché “a personal relationship with Jesus.” It’s hard to imagine a more disastrous twisting of what it means to be a Christian. Many people (including Judas and Satan) had some kind of “personal relationship” with Jesus during His earthly ministry without submitting to Him as Lord. But His only true friends were those who did what He said (John 15:14).
A Difficult Truth
Slavery to Christ is not a minor or secondary feature of true discipleship. It is exactly how Jesus Himself defined the “personal relationship” He must have with every true follower (John 12:26; 15:20). In fact, the fundamental aspects of slavery are the very features of redemption. We are chosen (Ephesians 1:4-5; 1 Peter 1:2; 2:9); bought (1 Corinthians 6:20; 7:23); owned (Romans 14:7-9; 1 Corinthians 6:19); subject to His will and control (Acts 5:29; Philippians 2:5-8); called to account (Romans 14:12); evaluated (2 Corinthians 5:10); and either chastened or rewarded by Him (1 Corinthians 3:14; Hebrews 12:5-11). Those are all essential components of slavery.
A Divine Introduction
Jesus introduced the NT slave metaphor. He frequently drew a direct connection between slavery and discipleship (Matthew 10:24-25). His words reflect what every true disciple should hope to hear at the end of life: “Well done, good and faithful slave. You were faithful with a few things, I will put you in charge of many things; enter into the joy of your master” (Matthew 25:21).
Jesus always described true discipleship in such terms, with no effort to adjust the message to make it sound appealing to worldly-minded sinners. He never muted what it would cost to follow Him. Would-be disciples who tried to dictate different terms were always turned away (Luke 9:59-62).
Slaves Who Are Friends
Perhaps the key passage on Jesus’ demand for implicit obedience is one already alluded to—John 15:14-15: “You are My friends if you do what I command you. No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.”
The fundamental principle here is obedience. Jesus was not suggesting that His favor could be earned through service. Rather, He was saying that obedience is a singular proof that someone is His friend. Implicit obedience to His commandments is the natural fruit of genuine love for Him—the telltale mark of authentic, saving faith.
Why, then, does He say, “No longer do I call you slaves…I have called you friends” (v. 15)? Is He expressly telling them their relationship with Him was now a familiar, personal camaraderie between colleagues, rather than a master-slave relationship governed by authority and submission?
Not at all. The apostles were still His slaves, because that’s precisely what they were. He was simply saying they were His friends as well as His slaves. “The slave,” He explains, “does not know what his master is doing.” A slave isn’t owed any explanation or rationale. But Jesus had kept nothing secret from His disciples: “all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you” (v. 15). They were therefore much more than mere slaves to Him. They were His friends as well, privy to His thoughts and purposes (cf. 1 Corinthians 2:16).
Slavery and True Liberty
So understood correctly, the gospel is an invitation to slavery. On the one hand, the gospel is a proclamation of freedom to sin’s captives and liberty to people who are broken by the bondage of sin’s power over them. On the other hand, it is a summons to a whole different kind of slavery: “Having been freed from sin, you became slaves of righteousness” (Romans 6:18; cf. 1 Peter 2:16).
Both sides of the equation are vital. There is a glorious freedom in being the slaves of Christ (John 8:36), but it means the end of human autonomy for the true follower of Christ. In other words, everyone serves some master. We are all enslaved in one way or the other (Romans 6:16-21).
There is no legitimate way to adjust the message in order to make it sound appealing to people who admire Jesus but aren’t prepared to serve Him. Jesus didn’t seek admirers; He was calling followers—not casual followers, but slaves. Remove that spirit of submission, and the most profound kind of “admiration” for Christ is a spiritual fraud that has nothing to do with true faith.
A Lying Tongue
A Heart that Devises Wickedness
Feet that Run Swifty to Evil
A False Witness
One who Spreads Strife
Proverbs 6:16-19 (NASB)
16There are six things which the LORD hates; yes, seven which are an abomination to Him: 17haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, 18a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that run rapidly to evil, 19a false witness who utters lies, and one who spreads strife among brothers.
The above passage contains what is called a numerical proverb, which is a form of Hebrew poetry that uses a series of items in order to build suspense with added emphasis on the final item. Thus, the “six…yes, seven” format is not to be understood as seven abominations with God hating only the first six; but as seven abominations hated by God with special attention on the last item. The question may be asked then, “What’s significant about the last item?” And the answer may be, perhaps, that one who spreads strife does so because all the preceding sins are a reality in his life.
Abomination noun: that which is detestable, vile, and shameful; arouses intense hatred coupled with disgust; and is abhorred or loathed
The passage at hand reveals a list of things God not only hates but considers abominable; and as you can see from this definition, this is no small matter. These seven things are characteristics of a person whom the Bible calls worthless and wicked and warns of their sudden and permanent destruction (Proverbs 6:12-15).
God hates pride and arrogance as well as those whose lifestyles are characterized by haughtiness. The Bible says those who are proud are an abomination to God; and they will not stand before Him or go unpunished. Those with haughty eyes are they who think too highly of themselves and who despise others. They are conceited and boast in their accomplishments, knowledge, or status; they trust in their own understanding, they disregard any reproof or correction, and they ignore God’s word. And in effect, they treat and think of themselves as though they were gods—violating the first commandment. They believe they are independent and self-sufficient apart from anyone else, let alone God. Simply put, anyone who is not humble, selfless, and contrite falls into this category. God gives grace to those who are humble, but is opposed to those who are proud.
Proverbs 16:5; Psalm 5:5; James 4:6
A Lying Tongue
God hates deceit and those who speak lies—whom the Bible says God abhors and will destroy. Those who lie break the ninth commandment and are in direct defiance and contradiction to God’s own nature because He Himself is truth; and so they demonstrate that Satan, not God, is their father—he who is the father of lies. Those who lie, stretch the truth, or equivocate with the intention of deceiving others all fit in this category. The Bible warns that all liars will have their part in the lake of fire.
Proverbs 12:22; Psalm 5:6; John 8:44; Revelation 21:8
God hates murder and those who shed innocent blood. The Bible says God abhors those who are associated with bloodshed and hates those who love violence. Murder is the premeditated unlawful killing of an innocent person, and those who do this break the sixth commandment. Those who shed innocent blood fall into this category and this includes those who carry out or are involved with abortions. You may not have actually murdered someone, but Jesus declared that whoever becomes angry with someone without a cause is a murderer in God’s eyes, as well as those who feel hatred for others. Those who take pleasure in bloodshed, whether it’s in video games, movies, fights, or whatever else that glorifies the shedding of innocent blood, fall into this category. The Bible warns that murderers are worthy of death and will have their part in the lake of fire.
Psalm 5:6; 11:5; Matthew 5:21-22; Romans 1:29, 32; 1 John 3:15; Revelation 21:8
A Heart that Devises Wickedness
God hates wickedness and those who do iniquity; those who are perverse in heart are abominable in His sight. The human heart is more deceitful than anything else and is desperately wicked, and it is out of this wicked heart that all types of evil and unrighteousness spring forth. Those who actively pursue the wicked impulses of their heart and fabricate evil schemes, plans, and ideas are the ones in mind here.
Proverbs 5:5; 6:18; 11:20; 15:9, 26; Jeremiah 17:9; Mark 7:20-23
Feet that Run Swiftly to Evil
God hates evil as well as those who delight in it and pursue it. God commands us all to hate and abhor evil; and the fear of God leads sinners to hate evil and turn away from it; but those who love and actively follow after evil demonstrate just how wicked, perverse, and depraved they really are. Those who delight in committing all manner of sin, ungodliness, and malice, whether in thought, word, or deed, fall into this category.
Psalm 5:5; 97:10; Hosea 9:15; Romans 12:9; Proverbs 8:13
A False Witness
Again, God hates deceit and those who speak lies; and though this may seem like it’s just repeating the second abomination, this one is dealing rather with the deliberate altering of truth with emphasis on hurting the reputation or person of an individual, or distorting the truth of God. It is a violation of the ninth commandment. This abomination also involves perjury—lying under oath, lying in a court of law, or lying so as to pervert justice. During the Old Testament times, witnesses were vital in many cases and the testimony they gave often determined the justification or condemnation of the person called into question. If someone committed a serious sin or crime worthy of death, the testimony of two or three witnesses would suffice in carrying out the death penalty. However, false witnesses fabricated stories and would deliberately speak false testimonies about the people they hated either to destroy their reputation or cause them to be put to death. Anyone who lies, slanders, gossips, or swears falsely to the hurt of another person falls into this category.
Psalm 5:6; Proverbs 12:22; Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15
One who Spreads Strife
God hates those who are contentious and who delight in stirring up trouble and discord. Such people are arrogant, perverse, hot-tempered, and insolent. They are scoffers and fools who slander and quarrel, and they love to instigate and cause problems, divisions, quarrels, and fights. They enjoy rousing up a person’s emotions and passions against another, and they take pleasure in the strife that ensues. They try to manipulate people to side with them in order to gain an advantage over others whom they hate, regardless if the people they’re intent on dividing are the closest of friends. They destroy the peace and unity of family, friends, companions, and any general relationship. The Bible says those who engage in spreading strife are worthy of death, and that those who participate in such abominable behavior will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Proverbs 13:10; 15:18; 16:28; 17:19; 18:6; 20:3; 22:10; 28:25; Romans 1:29, 31; Galatians 5:19-21
Hope for the Guilty
If these things which God hates are a reality in your life, there is yet hope for you if you will just humble yourself, cast your wicked ways behind you, and seek the Lord Jesus Christ. He died for sinners like you in order to set them free from their sins and to save them from the wrath of God.
Have you had haughty eyes? Humble yourself and cry out to God. Have you had a lying tongue? So did Peter, when he denied knowing Jesus; but the Lord had mercy on him, and he repented of his sins and began proclaiming Him publicly. Have you had murderous hands? So did the apostle Paul, who had many Christians put to death; but Jesus forgave him, and he forsook his wickedness and began preaching the gospel. Have you devised wickedness with your heart? God can replace your wicked heart of stone with a new heart of flesh, and He can cleanse you from your filthiness. Have you run swiftly toward evil? There is yet time for you to turn around and run toward Christ and His righteousness. Have you been a false witness? Forsake your lifestyle of deceit and sin, believe in the gospel, and Christ will make you a faithful witness of His power and grace. Have you spread strife? Give up your malicious efforts and seek the peace of God through Jesus Christ His Son.
Those who repent and forsake all their sins, turning to God and believing the gospel, and trusting in nothing except Christ for salvation, will be saved. It doesn’t matter what you have done…God will remove all your sins as far as the east is from the west. Therefore, repent and believe the gospel, for the kingdom of God is at hand!
Herein we find proof for the Divine inspiration of the Scriptures. The unregenerate do not really believe in the holiness of God. Their conception of His character is altogether one-sided. They fondly hope that His mercy will override everything else. “Thou thoughtest that I was altogether as thyself” (Ps. 50:21) is God’s charge against them. They think only of a “god” patterned after their own evil hearts. Hence their continuance in a course of mad folly. Such is the holiness ascribed to the Divine nature and character in Scripture that it clearly demonstrates their superhuman origin. The character attributed to the “gods” of the ancients and of modern heathendom are the very reverse of that immaculate purity which pertains to the true God. An ineffably holy God, who has the utmost abhorrence of all sin, was never invented by any of Adam’s fallen descendants! The fact is that nothing makes more manifest the terrible depravity of man’s heart and his enmity against the living God than to have set before him One who is infinitely and immutably holy. His own idea of sin is practically limited to what the world calls “crime.” Anything short of that, man palliates as “defects,” “mistakes,” “infirmities,” etc. And even where sin is owned at all, excuses and extenuations are made for it.
The “god” which the vast majority of professing Christians “love,” is looked upon very much like an indulgent old man, who himself has no relish for folly, but leniently winks at the “indiscretions” of youth. But the Word says, “Thou hatest all workers of iniquity “(Ps. 5:5). And again, “God is angry with the wicked every day” (Ps. 7:11). But men refuse to believe in this God, and gnash their teeth when His hatred of sin is faithfully pressed upon their attention. No, sinful man was no more likely to devise a holy God than to create the Lake of fire in which he will be tormented for ever and ever.
Attributes of God – AW Pink